The Philippines does not have a standalone cryptocurrency tax law, but crypto-related income is clearly taxable under existing tax regulations. Cryptocurrencies are not legal tender, yet they are recognised as digital assets and are widely regulated for financial and anti-money laundering purposes. Any income, gains, or profits derived from crypto trading, mining, staking, or business activities are subject to taxation under Philippine income tax rules, overseen by the Bureau of Internal Revenue (BIR). In practice, taxation depends on whether crypto activity is classified as personal investment, business income, or compensation.
When determining peso (PHP) market value at the time of a transaction, taxpayers often reference exchange price data such as the BTC price to support valuation records.
Cryptocurrency is not recognised as legal tender in the Philippines. The Bangko Sentral ng Pilipinas (BSP) classifies crypto as a virtual asset and regulates Virtual Asset Service Providers (VASPs) under its supervisory framework.
Crypto taxation in the Philippines relies on existing laws and regulatory guidance, including:
Profits from selling crypto for Philippine pesos or foreign currency are taxable. Gains are generally treated as ordinary income unless the taxpayer qualifies as a passive investor with limited activity.
Crypto-to-crypto transactions are considered taxable disposals if they generate an economic benefit. Gains are calculated based on the PHP value at the time of each trade.
Using crypto to pay for goods or services constitutes a disposal of the asset. Any gain realised may be subject to income tax.
Crypto received through:
is taxable as income based on its fair market value in PHP at the time of receipt.
Individuals or companies engaged in frequent trading, exchange operations, or crypto services may be classified as carrying on a business and taxed accordingly.
Crypto-related income earned by individuals is subject to progressive income tax rates, ranging from 0% to 35%, depending on total annual income.
Companies earning crypto-related income are generally subject to corporate income tax, typically at a rate of 25% (or 20% for qualifying SMEs).
The Philippines does not apply a specific capital gains tax framework to cryptocurrency. Gains are usually taxed as ordinary income.
All taxable crypto income must be declared in the taxpayer’s annual income tax return filed with the BIR.
Those engaged in crypto trading or services as a business may need to register with the BIR and assess whether VAT obligations apply, depending on transaction structure and revenue thresholds.
Taxpayers should maintain:
If crypto activity is classified as business income, losses may be deductible against other business income, subject to documentation and tax rules. Personal investment losses are generally not deductible.
NFTs are treated as digital assets. Income from NFT sales, royalties, or frequent trading may be taxed as ordinary income or business income.
Airdropped tokens may be taxable if received in exchange for services or promotional activities, based on their PHP value at receipt.
Income from staking, lending, liquidity pools, or yield farming may be taxable as income if it represents a measurable economic benefit.
The distinction between passive investing and business activity is critical. Frequency, volume, and profit intent all influence tax treatment.
All crypto transactions should be recorded with corresponding PHP values at the time they occur to support accurate tax reporting.
Failure to report crypto income may result in back taxes, penalties, interest, and potential audits. The BIR has broad authority to investigate undeclared income, including income derived from digital assets.
The Philippines taxes cryptocurrency through its general income tax system rather than a dedicated crypto tax law. While crypto is not legal tender, income derived from crypto activities is clearly taxable. Proper classification, accurate peso valuation, and thorough record-keeping are essential to remain compliant as regulatory scrutiny continues to increase.

In May 2026, the anonymous account "Serenity" posted a 4502.45% annual return, earning the title "White‑Haired Stock God" and rapidly surpassing 750,000 followers on X. His core investment philosophy can be summarised as the "Shiso Leaf" theory and the "Chokepoint" theory – not chasing giants, but deeply cultivating irreplaceable "bottleneck" links in the industry chain, using public information to uncover undervalued assets. His holdings are concentrated in global small‑ to mid‑cap tech stocks in photonics, semiconductor substrates, and power semiconductors. CoinW has listed AI‑theme tokens such as TAO, RENDER, and FET, but no token exclusive to him. Risks to note include his unverified identity, post‑surge pullbacks, and high volatility in crypto assets.

In 2026, the U.S. equity AI investment logic is shifting from concept speculation to earnings delivery. A capital expenditure super-cycle, led by hyperscale cloud providers, has taken shape, with total annual CapEx expected to exceed $700 billion, securing order visibility for the industry chain over the next 12–24 months. Within the three‑tier structure of the industry chain, compute infrastructure (Nvidia, Broadcom, etc.) offers the highest certainty; the foundation model layer still faces unclear profitability paths; and the application software layer benefits from dual optimization of revenue and costs. Investment opportunities are spreading sequentially across compute, storage, optical communications, and power supply. CoinW has launched its TradFi zone, supporting trading in U.S. equities such as Nvidia and Google, as well as AI‑theme tokens including TAO, RENDER, and FET. Risks to watch include elevated valuations, slowing CapEx growth, and geopolitical factors.

On June 23, 2026, global stock markets suffered a synchronized sell-off: South Korea's KOSPI plunged 9.99% and triggered two circuit breakers, Japan's Nikkei 225 dropped 3.55%, China's A-share ChiNext fell 3.84%, and U.S. equity futures tumbled over 2% pre-market. The root cause lies in the AI trade shifting from "valuation expansion" to "earnings validation" – SpaceX lost 31% in three days (four simultaneous blows: acquisition dilution, bond issuance, options shorting, and fundamentals collapse), Google dropped 5% on talent departure, compounded by Korea's leveraged ETF regulatory scare, pre-earnings caution on Micron, and Fed hawkish signals pushing the 10‑year yield to 4.49%. The bigger test for SpaceX lies ahead with insider unlock in August.